Saturday, March 1, 2025

Notation explanation for Materna Semantics

This post branches from the previous post at the indicated point.

Explain this notation:

\[ \text{Fact} = \lambda w \lambda t [^0 A_{wt} [^0 H_{wt} \ ^0 M_{wt}]] \]

This notation comes from Transparent Intensional Logic (TIL), a higher-order intensional logic developed by Pavel Tichý, which is based on λ-calculus and type theory. The notation expresses a fact as a structured construction, where facts are functions that take a possible world \( w \) and a time \( t \) as arguments and return a truth value.


Breaking Down the Notation

\[ \text{Fact} = \lambda w \lambda t [^0 A_{wt} [^0 H_{wt} \ ^0 M_{wt}]] \]

Each part has a specific meaning:

  1. \( \lambda w \lambda t \) → This denotes a function that takes a possible world \( w \) and a time \( t \) as arguments.

    • In Possible Worlds Semantics (PWS), truth is relative to a world \( w \) and a time \( t \).
    • The expression after these λ-binders defines what this function outputs.
  2. \( [^0 A_{wt} [^0 H_{wt} \ ^0 M_{wt}]] \) → This is the core construction that determines the fact in \( w \) and \( t \). It consists of:

    • \( ^0 A_{wt} \): The trivialization of the function \( A_{wt} \), which represents a property or relation.
    • \( ^0 H_{wt} \): The trivialization of the function \( H_{wt} \), which denotes an entity (e.g., “the highest mountain”).
    • \( ^0 M_{wt} \): The trivialization of the function \( M_{wt} \), which denotes another entity (e.g., “Mount Everest” or another mountain).

Understanding the Construction

  • The inner expression: \[ [^0 H_{wt} \ ^0 M_{wt}] \] means that the function \( H_{wt} \) is applied to \( M_{wt} \). This could mean checking whether the object denoted by \( M_{wt} \) (e.g., Mount Everest) satisfies the property \( H_{wt} \) (e.g., being the highest mountain).

  • Then, the outer function \( A_{wt} \) is applied: \[ ^0 A_{wt} [^0 H_{wt} \ ^0 M_{wt}] \] This could represent a further predicate (e.g., "is located in Asia") applied to the constructed result.

  • Finally, \( \lambda w \lambda t \) abstracts over this entire expression, making it a function of world and time.


What This Represents

This expression defines a propositional function that determines whether a given sentence (such as "The highest mountain is in Asia") is true in different possible worlds and times.

For example:

  • \( H_{wt} \) could mean “the highest mountain in the world at \( w,t \)”.
  • \( M_{wt} \) could denote “Mount Everest”.
  • \( A_{wt} \) could mean “is located in Asia”.
  • The entire expression constructs the proposition “The highest mountain is in Asia”, whose truth value depends on \( w \) and \( t \).

In short: \[ \lambda w \lambda t [^0 A_{wt} [^0 H_{wt} \ ^0 M_{wt}]] \] defines a function that returns "true" (T) if the highest mountain in world \( w \) and time \( t \) is in Asia, and "false" (F) otherwise.

Would you like a concrete example with specific world-time assignments?

Materna Semantics

In the context, I gave ChatGPT the text of Is Strong Correspondence (Theory of Truth) Possible?, by Pavel Materna, which is omitted. I am sharing this conversation because ChatGPT kept offering to do more different examples to explain it to me, which I found interesting.